Get (scale)Down!

Did you honestly think we would host another boring lecture for our big website launch party? Think again...

StereoGoesStellar to play at SCALEDOWN UNVEILED!

from SGS's media release...

State of the Stellar Address

"StereoGoesStellar, Windsor's premier piano based indie poppers, have been in the studio since early January this year. The ScaleDown.ca Website Launch Party will be their last show in Windsor until the band releases their first and highly anticipated full length album in May 2008."

Stellar Biography

"Composed of four of Windsor's least attractive musicians, and one of it's hottest (Keith), StereoGoesStellar aims to provide it's small but loyal following with a good time, every time, but not for a long time. That is to say that prolonged exposure to the members of StereoGoesStellar has been found to result in a gashes, thrashes, and of course, rashes.

While a spoonful of recordings are available from the ferocious fivesome, the nostalgia that radiates from the very centroid of the group's improbable inertia of instrumentaion is something that is to be experienced live when it is traversed to the crowd in a slurry of blood, sweat, and a number of unknown and indistinguishable substances that for the most part merely offend all five senses, but to a lesser degree, entertain and enthrall.

And despite the power and driven tones of the bands inadvertently large and rounded sound, the soft and fuzzy lyrical eccentricities that tell of unrectifiable mistakes and the unfortunate reign of hindsight are seldom lost, but alternately amplified to polar bear sized proportions that will in turn musically assault you and feed you to its young."

There's nothing boring about what Scaledown.ca is trying to accomplish, so it is perfectly natural that their launch party is anything but boring as well...

The Crisis of Happiness

As a lead-up to the February 20th launch party, and the presentation by guest speaker and author Chris Turner, I wanted to take a look at some of the progressive ideas being implemented in cities abroad that are making drastic changes to the way humanity is able live.

London, England

The view of London as a commuter nightmare is not one that most North Americans would readily apply, but, in spite of the classic double-decker buses and subway system, London has had to take drastic measures to improve air quality and reduce traffic congestion in their city core.

According to an Associated Press article posted on MSNBC, Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London, increased commuter charges and are going after the big polluters, targeting 4x4 vehicles and luxury sedans. The average commuter pays $16 a day to drive in the city; the 33,000 vehicles targeted under the new legislation will pay $49 a day, if approved.. Even NYC is proposing a 'sin tax' for cars in Lower Manhattan.

Think a 'sin tax' on driving is a steep price to pay? Paris plans to ban suburban cars from the city centre by 2012 to reduce noise, pollution and congestion and recreate "the art of urban joy".

Paris, France

The Pompidou expressway, stretching from the Louvre to the Pont de Sully, is covered in sand. This is not a natural disaster, or a corporate publicitiy event, but an intentional act to reclaim city streets for the citizens of Paris, a city which Kunstler referred to as a "human-scale touch on the urban form", during the summer months. The Paris Plage, as the summer road-to-beach transformation is called, is part of an on-going movement in Paris to transition the city streets from the motorized masses and return them to Parisian people.

An article called The Happy City, written by Charles Montgomery, details French, among other, reclamation projects designed to increase human interaction. Montgomery states that these changes will "change not just streets but the very soul of urban spaces." -- and we tend to agree!

Bogota, Columbia

Under the direction Enrique Penalosa, Mayor of Bogota, and in an effort to combat a city "mired in poverty, chaos, violence and crippling traffic", this South American city ditched a freeway intended to ease the commute of the suburbanite masses (ED: Sound familiar?), and instead invested in the "frequencey of positive interaction". By building "parks, hundreds of kilometers of bikes paths and pedestrian 'freeways' [and] an efficient rapid bus system" the happiness of the city increased. How do you measure happiness? Road fatalities fell by 33% and the murder rate dropped by 40%. Now wouldn't that make you happy?

Bogota is on a roll and has voted to ban private cars from rush hour traffic by 2015. Imagine the changes in a city where rush hour traffic was concentrated on mass transit or pedestrian scale mobility. Montgomery quotes John Helliwell, a University of British Columbia professor emeritus and economist, when he states "[f]requency of positive interaction is the key."


Through these examples Montgomery emulates Chris Turner who, in his book The Geography of Hope, demonstrates that the changes we need to make in Windsor are already being made in other cities in the world with amazing success. Montgomery's article details some of the largest cities making even bigger changes successfully increasing happiness among their citizens. The message of ScaleDown.ca echoes the refrain of Montgomery -- we can make drastic changes to 'they way we have always done things' and not only survive but thrive as a community, an economy and a part of the human collective.

Windsor can, must, and will make the changes necessary to revitalize itself through the work and efforts of an engaged citizenry. We, as members of that citizenry, must decide whether we want to be as the French, making changes to increase an already high standard of living or wait until we are like Bogota, ready to pull out all the stops to make the changes necessary just to survive.

*****

International cities are making huge changes, implementing real ideas, to combat the erosion of urban happiness. What changes have you seen, or would like to see, in Windsor to increase, intensify or re-establish our urban happiness? Post your thoughts in our comments section


All quotes in the article, unless otherwise stated, come from Charles Montgomery's article "The Happy City"

Cities: A Smart Alternative to Cars

I heard a rumour that Buzz Hargrove ghost-wrote this article for Business Week magazine. It's a stretch. Let me know what you think...

Cities:
A Smart Alternative to Cars
Creating compact communities—and eliminating the need to drive everywhere—may be the best way to slash greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles

"...The best car-related innovation we have is not to improve the car but to eliminate the need to drive it everywhere we go. In the U.S,, we need to stop sprawl and build well-designed compact communities. The land-use patterns in our communities dictate not only how much we drive, but how sustainable we can be on all sorts of fronts. And sprawled-out land uses generate enormous amounts of automotive greenhouse gases. A recent major study, Growing Cooler, published by Smart Growth America, a coalition of national, state, and local organizations that addresses urban planning, makes the point clearly: If 60% of new developments were even modestly more compact, we'd emit 85 million fewer metric tons of tailpipe [car emissions] CO2 each year by 2030—as much as would be saved by raising the national mileage standards to 32 mpg."

You can read the entire article here.

Chris Turner Book Giveaway

You've just found Scaledown's first official schwag offer! It's an exciting time here and we would like to share some of this excitement with SD readers.

Over the course of this next week, we will be throwing all the names of everyone who comments on this blog entry into a hat, and the two names we draw out will receive a copy of Chris Turner's latest book, The Geography Of Hope. On Monday, Feb 18th, be sure to check back as we will be announcing the winners right here.

As you know, Chris will be the keynote speaker at the SCALEDOWN UNVEILED event on February 20th at the Caboto Club, and this is where you will be able to meet the author and get you copy signed. So get those names in so we can get this book into your hands.

We think you'll be better off after having read it :)

Under the microscope...

Well, since Window's Movie Maker apparently hates me, I couldn't embellish this video clip of my interview with Cogeco's Joe McParland. You'll have to deal with the raw footage that my friendly neighbourhood media-pusher Chris Schnurr sent over to me tonight.



Thanks a ton, Chris. I'll get this stuff figured out eventually.

The gift that keeps on giving...

Tonight, as you know, is our regularly scheduled city council meeting. (be sure to watch Joe McParland's Council Warm Up at 5:45, as Mark and I are being interviewed on it) There's some interesting items coming before council that I want to highlight here.

Drive-thrus

Do we have to repeatedly make our case every time there's a deferral? Again we revisit the new downtown Burger King and their desire to install a drive thru for their restaurant. Our illustrious Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), intensely aware of how a progressive city develops (sarcasm) recommended a zoning change to allow the drive-through back in January of '07. Through public backlash and insight, our council denied the applicants zoning change application, only to have it appealed to the OMB (don't you wish we actually had control of how we develop our community?). In August of the same year, PAC recommended the approval of the applicants new zoning application and this time council buckled and approved it. So now, this little plot of land will be accessed by three curb cuts/access points- - but at least they're giving us some bike racks and a promise to protect a couple of trees!

To show just how maleable our Official Plan actually is, I wanted to include this quote from the administration report...

"After due consideration of the City of Windsor's Official Plan design guidelines for mixed use development within the City Centre Planning District, The Site Plan Review Committee has proposed the following direction:. (i) to recess the building wall away from the Goyeau Street lot line so as to accomodate the proposed after-hour walk-up windows, and at the same time, ensure safe pedestrian movement on the sidewalk in front of the subject land, (ii) to eliminate the request for 4.95m land conveyance along University Avenue frontage since engineering and Cororate Projects, Public Works Department has given its waiver of the requirement, and (iv) to deny present or future vehicular access along University Avenue frontage, by imposing a requirement for conveyance of a 1-foot reserve along the entire length of the University Avenue frontage"

FYI - I didn't mis-number those notations, that was the way administration presented the report.

For those of you familiar with the term "Mixed Use", does Site Plan Review's recommendations have anything to do with the definition you hold in your mind?

This should help attract world-class talent to the newly revitalized Armouries concert hall next door, shouldn't it? Vicky Kyriaco-Wilson, representing the Armouries Concert Hall Committee, is scheduled to speak on the issue. In addition to Ms. Kyraico-Wilson on the delegate list are a couple of "mystery" speakers; Scott Arbuckle, representing Planning & Engineering Initiative Ltd (Kitchener, ON) is listed and judging by this company's website, it seems as though they may be speaking proactively regarding the impact of developments like this; and then there's the like of Stewart Elkins, representing iTrans Consulting (Richmond Hill, ON), who (once again just by going by their company's website) appears to be speaking in favour of the development. Folks, you need to jump on the phones again because the hired guns are on top of this one!

We've got to nip this trend in the bud...

...because the drive-through-happy PAC is recommending yet another drive-through, though this one's located in the sub-urbs so I don't believe it will meet much opposition. The funny thing about this recommendation is that the drive-through is for a financial institituon. Is there nothing that people won't get out of their cars to do? Not even the Tim Horton's across the street from this proposed location has a drive-through, and we all know how much Timmy-fans like staying in their cars while buying coffee.

Official Plan Review

PAC has received administrations Official Plan Review report #17 and is forwarding it along to council tonight, so the process is rumbling along as predicted. Reading through the document one thing struck me as being contradictory. In it, Chris Aspila, the Official Plan Review (OPR) Project Manager states that "Windsor's economy is restructuring away from heavy manufacturing..." and from everything that we are experiencing with our declining automotive industry as well as the supporting Tool and Die businesses closing up shop, we would be fools to disagree with him.

Supporting documents (foundation studies) provided by the Planning department include i) 25 year Population and Housing Projections, and ii) 20 year Employment Projections and Employment Land Needs Analyses, which were initiated due to provincial requirements during every Official Plan 5 year review. Now, I have yet to read through these documents, (they are sitting on my bedside table as we speak) however, there seems to be a focus on our supposed lack of shovel-ready industrial land.

"In order to enhance Windsor's competitiveness in attracting future investment, it will be important to ensure that a good supply of serviced vacant employment land is available through the current 20 year planning period. Given the relatively limited amount of uncommitted high-quality serviced employment lands available in Windsor at present, it will be particularly important for the City of Windsor to move forward with the development of Secondary Plans and servicing of employment lands in the Sandwich South Planning District."(which is essentially the Annexed Lands near the airport)

Considering the rate at which we have businesses occupying serviced industrial properties closing up within the city already, and our "supposed" focus of moving away from heavy industrial towards a more knowledge-based local economy, these plans don't make a heck of a lot of sense. They also want to provide land for "office park development" when our downtown office vacancy is sky-high. So, why would we "invest" in supplying this expensive infrastructure to what is predominantly agricultural land if "Windsor's economy is restructuring away from heavy manufacturing..."?

It's not too late for everyone to get their comments into the planning department for compilation of the Official Plan Review. So, if this focus doesn't sit well with you either, please let them know by dialling 311 or visiting the official OPR website.

Let's Co-operate

If ever there was a time and a place to look at re-localizing economic activity, it would be - here and now. This past week two more Windsor manufacturers called it quits. We lost another 600 automotive sector jobs and even worse will be the loss of the gel-caps jobs that represented some of our precious economic diversity.

Both companies are owned by corporations outside of the Windsor/Essex region. Neither corporation has any reason to consider the impact moving these operations will have on our city/region or the people that will be hurt. It’s not that these plants didn’t make money, or the quality of their work was anything but top-notch. The problem was they weren’t making enough money. And that is unfair. But it will continue as long as we rely on big corporations to drive our economy. Somehow we need to take control of the way we work and earn, spend and invest. We need to keep our money and company profits in this region.

In the course of last weeks comments, urbane cyclist asked, “What do we do about it (our economy) as a municipality? Because that is the level that scaledown is working at, that is the level that we can impose solutions.”

The easiest local economic system I could see us starting around here would be a series of co-ops. This would allow farmers, artisans, trades people and others an opportunity to share the cost of running their business with their customers. This kind of set-up is ideal because the customers and the business operators will develop the kind of relationships that used to exist before the big-box when the Main Street merchants knew their customers and worked hard to make sure they were satisfied and the customers felt appreciated. Those relationships are missing in our world today. You go to a big-box and there is no personal service. The employees are anonymous and the people that come in are just customers/consumers. Scaling back our economic world is not much different from our built world. We really don't connect with people anymore in our day-to-day because everything is so out of proportion to the individual. We need to make that connection, to work together to raise ourselves up again.

A co-operative economy would just be the beginning. As the individual businesses grew they could set-up on their own and expand and reinvest in themselves and the community. A co-op would foster the start-ups and after a while we could have a thriving local economy that, if supplemented with some new large corporate investments would make Windsor/Essex a great place to live and work again.

Congratulations to St. Clair Students

I’d just like to highlight a Windsor Star story and congratulate the St. Clair College, Interior Design Students on their fantastic work. These students beat out some very high-caliber schools to finish first and third out of a field of 45 schools (Canada, U.S. and England) each school was represented by three teams.

This just further demonstrates the talent of our young people and the quality of our post-secondary institutions.

1st Place
Second Year Students
Jeff Wortley, Megan Whittal and Tammy Bourke

3rd Place
Third Year Students
Cassandra Kotva and Magda Trzos

Only the first three places were reported but St. Clair's other entry was submitted by:
Third year students
Sheila Golez, Curtis Linder and Brooke Simon

For more information on the competition go to http://www.idec.org/

P.S. I had an image of the winning entry but blogger is not letting me upload.

The Arts Part 1: Introduction and Funding

I would like to begin with a disclaimer: I know very little of the history of Windsor's Arts Scene, my comments simply as an outside observer and are meant to provoke discussion vs. being a judgement on our arts groups.

My first experience with an arts Incubator was in Kalamazoo, Michigan where I was sent by the International Downtown Association to look at the downtown as a model for Windsor. Its an idea that seems to not be able to gain any traction in Windsor.

In London Ontario they have the Arts Program or TAP, although it is in financial difficulties you have to admire the ambition of the project. Conversion of a 15,000 ft2 bldg with a 100 seat theater. The Arts Program provides

- Exhibition space
- Performance Areas
- Educational Arts Program
- Arts Business Skills
- Mentorship Opportunities
- Arts Related programs
- Artist Studio's

Funded with a 2 year trillium grant of $100,000 in the year 2000 and another $130,000 in the year 2002 Trillium still obtains $13,000-$15,000 in city grants each year which are used to pay its property taxes. (Funding to be discussed on Tuesday)

The only comparables I'm aware of in Windsor are Artcite and the Arts Council office located in Walkerville with about 2000 feet of exhibition space between them. This is not a "jab" at Windsor, it's a contrast in what is possible. Remember if it exists elsewhere, you can't argue that its not possible here.

We have the vacant buildings for something like this. We can talk about the Pelissier Street parking garage main floor, the recently opened gallery by Christian Aldo in a creative partnership with a building owner that sees vacant bldgs made attractive.

There is so much to talk about but unfortunately today I only have time for the intro. This is where the blogging community comes in...

Next in the series are the parts entitled "The Arts mean Business" and "Funding"

After hours bars study correction

Just to correct the assertion that the closing of after hours bars was never studied. It was studied in council report 13049 and the DWBIA was denied the ability to put the issues, information and experts forward that would have prevented the current circus we see. As evidence THis letter was sent last year, I guess some councillors didnt' read this letter either.

Good Morning Councillors:
I have reviewed the Council Report 13049 regarding After Hours Clubs. As this is a “Note and File” recommendation, we were informed by the City Clerk’s Office that delegations will not be heard on the issue.

As such, the DWBIA requests that Council direct Administration to work closely with the DWBIA in researching this issue and that the DWBIA be included in the discussion from the beginning through to the end of the study.

As an FYI – the Licensing Commission met on October 9th, 2007. I was informed by a person in the Licensing Department that this meeting was open to the public, however when two of my Board Members tried to enter the meeting, they were told to leave. I was assured by Licensing that we would be involved in this process, yet this Council Report has come forward without consultation with the DWBIA.

Judith C. Veresuk
Executive Director
Downtown Windsor Business Improvement

Bringing Mom and Dad back into the city

For the core of a city to be revitalized, the base assumption is that the residential component must be one of the first aspects of the areas land use that must be strengthened.

This is a great place to start, because without people you have no business nor culture. People are at the centre of everything the notion of "city" stands for. it is the obvious place to begin. However, is the city the place for children?

People move to the suburbs (or so they say) because they feel it is in the best interest of the children. More green space to play ball as opposed to asphalt, hopscotch without worrying about cars, and clean, fresh, country-esque air. Since the rise of Levittown, NY, the first modern "subdivision", this was a major draw for young families. With the ever-increasing flow of families from the core to the suburbs, the school system has reactively moved their operations to reflect this trend.

Schools make 'burbs' place to be
The Ottawa Citizen
Monday, February 04, 2008

Communities need basic amenities to survive. A successful neighbourhood must have such things as grocery stores,churches, restaurants, hardware stores, medical facilities and schools to prosper.

More and more, our downtown neighbourhoods are being hollowed out of the basic necessities. And increasingly to live downtown, one must drive to the suburbs to get a plant, a stick of wood or a bolt. Living downtown is supposed to be a more pedestrian-oriented, environmental way of living. However, core dwellers appearto need cars to survive as vital businesses depart to the suburbs. The necessities of downtown are becoming caffeine and sushi rather than hammers and nails.

So too are demographics changing our urban landscape. The dominant post-war baby-boom generation has had its children so, in older neighbourhoods, schools are emptying. It is beginning at the elementary level now and will follow a relentless path through high school and university.

In fact, suburban schools are weathering the demographic onslaught best. That's because families, looking for inexpensive housing and a bit of green in which children can play, opted for the suburbs. That said, the decision to live in suburbs in not the most environmentally sensitive one. Suburbs create long commutes and promote sprawl -- the ultimate desecration of the land by paving it.

Ottawa's official plan is trying to contain growth within an urban boundary beyond which development cannot pass. The city is actively encouraging intensive development in the core areas to piggyback on existing services inexpensively and to cut environmentally unfriendly long commutes. But for intensification to succeed, to encourage families to live and work in the core, there must be the basic amenities of life -- including schools.

Our school boards are not in the urban-planning business. No, they need to educate young people well and efficiently. There is no money to maintain mostly empty schools downtown. Schools must remain open where they are needed and those institutions appear to be in the suburbs. It would be nice to keep a school or two open downtown for community purposes if that is possible. However, neither school boards nor cities are exactly flush with cash so this might be impossible.

The upside to this is that closing schools and decreasing enrolment is likely to make education less expensive. That will free funds for more pressing requirements in society. All this sad news about downtown schools comes as Statistics Canada released a report showing that car ridership continues to increase in Canada.

So at a time when the city would like people to move downtown, the future of our society, children, are being raised inthe suburbs. And with few schools to attend downtown, they are likely to stay there.

Is it fair to say that we will not be attracting families to our core in the foreseeable future? With childhood obesity rates attributed to a sedentary lifestyle that has been linked to suburban sprawl and over reliance on the automobile, could it not be considered "child abuse" for Windsor to not plan for attracting families to our core.

Just as the community has supported the University in their decision not to build their engineering campus downtown by stating that it is not within the mandate of that institution to revitalize a district, it is also not within the mandate of the other educational institutions either. Yet, with our school boards following the people out to the suburbs they have profoundly affected the health of of our communities as well as their students. While they may not have the responsibility of resurrecting a district, they have a responsibility to their students.

At what point do we determine that the school boards must play a proactive role in determining the physical layout of our community by cooperating in master plans as developed by our planning department? At what point do we transfer more of the control in determining the success of our communities from the school board trustees who merely follow the real estate developers over to our trained professionals who knows how to guide them?

Shout out

For those who aren't following the presentations of the Canadian Blog Awards, two Windsor blogs placed first and second in the Best Local Blog category. WindsorEats and International Metropolis placed first and second respectively.

Way to go folks! Check out this link for the complete list.

I must have been dreaming...

In this week's article I'll continue my discussion of leadership, contrasting past leaders with those elected officials at the helm of our city today.

On August 28th, 1963 Martin Luther King delivered, what has become, one of the most famous speeches in the history of the world. Remembered by the trademark statement 'I have a dream' King's address propelled the issue of racial segregation and discrimination from a 'black-issue' to a national travesty, garnering the support of political, religious and business leaders in a united effort to beat the plague of racism. King's dedication in identifying and transcending the racial divide, especially in the Southern states, was immortalized when he was assassinated on April 4th, 1968. An impassioned leader, King intimately understood the problem at hand, developed a vision and a plan and, in the end, was willing to sacrifice everything to achieve the greater good.

Fast-forward almost 45 years and present day Windsor. In the May 2006 State of the City address Mayor Eddie Francis delivered a cacophony of vision and promises for a better city. Mayor Francis reminisced on his committments of 2004 to build "a city renewed .... a clean city ... a city with a thriving, vibrant culture." He identified four key areas that, when addressed in parallel, would create a symbiotic success.

First, financial stability. Francis committed to manage our tax dollars more efficiently by focusing on core municipal services and "not wasting money on things that a municipal government should never have been paying for in the first place." He also committed to tackle the root causes of debt and high taxes.

Second, better service and more accountability through corporate accountability and "the idea that the municipality is there to serve the people and not the other way around."

Third, jobs and investment. Francis declared that Windsor would compete for jobs and investment "just like our entrepreneurs and businesses", while attracting and retaining smart people and growth industries through infrastructure, environmental and economic development.
Fourth, defend the interests of the people of Windsor, especially on the border issue.

On the face of it, Francis appears to understand that municipal accountability, a robust and sustainable economy, built on the foundation of environmental, social and cultural diversity, with a good dose of tax reductions, without the associated reductions in service or increase in debt, will build a strong and vibrant city. A review of the current status of our local economy, introverted municipal government and rising taxes, both property and essential services, shows that reality flies in the face of the commitment by Francis and city council.

In spite of 28 pages trumpeting the successes of his first term, astute citizens recognize that Windsor, under Francis' leadership, has done little to "build a greater city." Some of the 2006 "accomplishments" are down-right laughable, including the following proclamation:

"We are beautifying our neighbourhoods and streetscapes...We're bringing people
back downtown. The entire face of our downtown is transforming, and transforming
for the better...[W]e talked about building a balanced downtown where people could
live, work and play."

Talk is cheap. Windsor needs a leader, politician or otherwise, who is willing to throw caution to wind and do what is right for the people. Windsor has the resources that it needs to become everything that Mayor Francis proclaimed it was, could be and will be. It is time to unleash the collective creativity of grass roots citizens, city administration and our municipal government. It is time to make the changes that need to be made, before tragedy or circumstance force us to play catch up in a race for status quo.

Forget re-election. Forget pork-barrelled, backroom deals. Forget maintaining status quo. Windsor needs someone who is going to get the job done; to make the changes that will transform our city into an oasis of sustainability and prosperity. Windsor needs a maverick, a loose-cannon; someone to buck the system. I long for the day when the grand standing of city council is interrupted by a booming voice of reason, calling council to action that doesn't involve patting each other on the back. We need a political martyr, ready to force the changes that Windsor needs or die, socially and politically speaking, while trying.

Rejected...

Well, I knew it would happen one of these days. The following letter is the first one of mine that The Windsor Star decided not to print. The funny thing is that the Star employee responsible for the letters-to-the-editor didn't know what "RFP" stood for and wrote back to me asking.

Wow, my ego is really taking a beating these days...

Re: U of W arts campus called possible for Windsor core, Jan 30.

Windsor City Councillors, PLEASE do not use this latest anouncement by the University of Windsor as further reason to hold up the RFP process for the Urban Village plans on the City Centre West lands.

We need to move forward with issuing the requests for proposals to guage interest in redeveloping the Urban Village in our downtown. Revitalizing our downtown core is paramount to the health and economic well-being of our city. By bringing residents to our core, we will then start to lure the necessary businesses to support these new residents, creating a positive-feedback loop. All these issues must be dealt with in tandem. Partnering with the DWBIA in cleaning the area up and making it safer will yield much higher benefits than simply waiting for that "silver bullet" mega-project to come in and save us.

We look to our elected leaders to offer some help in achieving this outcome. What do ward councillors Jones and Postma have to say? They have been conspicuously silent since the Universities decision to locate the engineering school on campus. The community/downtown activists cannot do it alone. It is time to step up to the plate and work with us, as this idea of a "community partnership" has produced such great results in more cities than I can count, and the energy and desire is out here to move forward. You are squandering some precious community resources if you choose not to act any longer.

Chris Holt
scaledown.ca

It's a good thing I have an alternate venue with which to air my grievances. How about all those other rejected writers that don't, however?

What I Know and do not Know about the After Hours Debate

Some random thoughts about last nights latest installment in the Afterhours debate. What has become an ongoing saga with no end in site.

I know the mayor was probably right about the need for a council report to withstand an OMB challenge. As he put it, any articling law student should know that

I do not know why he or the city solicitor did not make this clear three weeks ago. I am only registering to speak to the merits or disadvantages of this issue and a bylaw, not to judge its ability to withstand court challenges. Had this been made clear to councillors three weeks ago, we would have saved a lot of everyones time

I do know that the main argument of Diane Sibley about not having bylaw enforcement officers on staff after 3am is an insult to logic and intelligence of everyone. If Windsor cannot enforce a bylaw that sees these establishments closed after 3am, how can it enforce bylaws such as noise when they are allowed to remain open.

I do not know why another report will be issued that does not allow input from the DWBIA who has access to numerous experts and information on the subject such as Peter Belmio, Responsible Hospitality Institute and others.

I do know that the Police chief opposes this bylaw for the stated reason of its similarity in effect to the prostitution debate.

I do not know why the Police chief cannot understand the simple reasoning behind moving this problem out of pelissier and downtown. That this area is unique in Windsor because 1 billion dollars (Yes a billion) has been invested into downtown with Casino, convention center, arena, transit, college campus, Streetscape and decoration, districting, DWBIA facade grant incentives etc... and that investment deserves to be protected.

I do know that when the Peter Belmio Report was debated and accepted that there was no objection from the police chief.

I do not know why some councillors take their positions. Although I fully understand the points of view of Councillors Dilkins, Gignac and Hatfield in wanting to wait for the report. I cannot understand many of the comments of councillors Marra and especially councillor Lewenza who was quoted as saying "sometimes the best thing we can do is to do nothing at all"

I do know how this will play out. The DWBIA will spend thousands on bringing experts to restate its case. If council decides to not solve this problem in a way that sees the dangerous situation that exists on Pelissier and Wyandotte then video will be released that shows the public the situation as it exists on Saturday at 3am.

I do not know why its taken five years for administration to recommend alternative solutions and whether they will meaningfully address the desires of the Responsible Hospitality Institute or the Belmio recommendations

I do know that after all the above takes place and years go by that this will then become an election issue.

I do not know why a councillor would want to run supporting after hours bars against the will of the vast majority of residents and the vast majority of businesses. I do not know why they are not worried about the voters

I do know that my picture above shows the pottersville dream that doing nothing will see and that no matter how many years it takes to implement the 2003 Belmio recommendations, it's a wonderful life downtown.

London's best practices belong to Windsor!

Scaledown gives a grand applause for the ingenuity of the joint bid for the 2012 World Junior Hockey Championships. I think Windsorites need to take a closer look at London, the Ambassador London Program and the more recent Downtown Living section in the London Freepress and London’s success in bringing residents downtown.

Again, like our guest speaker Chris Turner, our main premise lies in that if it exists somewhere else in the world, then there can be no argument as to whether it is possible.

The Ambassador London program alone should make you understand our Mayor’s frustration at how Windsorites beat up our own city as opposed to becoming its ambassadors. Now don’t get me wrong, all is not sunshine, rainbows and puppy dogs in London. The Ambassador Program has just had a scandal where a 3 minute commercial cost $51,000, and the commercial is a real yawner compared to the Downtown Windsor commercial by HCA and Suede Productions which cost the DWBIA a teeny-tiny fraction of that amount. The point is that if it wasn’t for my post you would never have heard about their mistakes where Windsor’s problems are virtually shouted by megaphone.

(Downtown Windsor's video can be seen on their webpage by clicking on video at the bottom left. London's comparison video can be seen here) Maybe we can trade some of our best practices for some of theirs.

Another of Londons' major accomplishments is that they have added or will add more than 1,700 apartment units to downtown and here is a quote from Mainstreet London which is the equivalent of the Downtown Windsor BIA.

"Residential is key to all this," says Janette MacDonald, general manager of MainStreet London. People who live downtown shop, dine and entertain themselves there.

You know that I have to repeat the fact that Downtown London completed their community improvement plan and implemented the Development incentives recommended by that plan over a decade ago. And don’t be fooled, Downtown London probably has more safety problems and incidents than Downtown Windsor. London installed 16 security camera’s and started a progressive graffiti removal program that sees offenders diverted from the courts to scrub and clean. Windsorites can still top London once and a while though; London’s security camera program costs them $200,000 annually, picked up 100% by the city. The joint city-DWBIA program gives us approx. 10 camera’s and only costs the city $15,000 annually.

Hopefully our joint bid with London will allow Windsorites to focus on that city’s best practices so we can add them to our own.

Friday, lets compare the arts in London to Windsor

Scaledown means Windsor can only go UP!

Sorry James, couldn't let that pic stand as our cover page

Scale Down Our Economy

Here at scaledown.ca we are asking that our city promote development of walkable neighbourhoods and encourage everyone to participate in the cultural and social fabric of the community.

I want to believe everyone has our best interests at heart when they make plans and decisions that will affect us. After hearing the Windsor Essex Development Commission presentation Wednesday evening I got to wondering if some organizations are not as interested in being progressive and proactive. Perhaps they need the status quo just to be relevant. What if the future is radically different from the present? What if events take hold of the world that could undo everything that we take for granted? Below I have outlined three scenarios. Each could have devastating effects on the world economy and the Windsor-Essex regional economy; since it is biased toward export markets we would definitely be affected.

1. Presently there is real concern in the world financial markets. The financial wizards invented investment vehicles out of worthless mortgages, collected huge commissions and got rich. Now we find out that these financial vehicles are nearly worthless. Billions of dollars of investments have disappeared already and more invented wealth is soon to follow. Add to this turmoil a U.S. Federal Government $9 trillion in the hole and their dollar losing value and you have the makings of a severe financial crisis.
   


2. The evidence is mounting that world oil production is not going to meet global demand within a short period of time. Competition for oil and petroleum products will continue to put upward pressure on costs for transportation and industrial and agricultural chemicals. This competition may lead to resource wars but certainly will significantly impact global trade. Currently there is no alternative energy technology/infrastructure to replace gasoline and distillates on the required scale to maintain business-as-usual.
   


3. The U.S. government has been taking increasingly aggressive positions around the world, moving its armies and navies into provocative postures and more or less causing a great deal of international tension. At some point it may very well happen that the world will find itself at war. Not just a regional conflict like Iraq or Afghanistan but a real war between two major armies and their allies shooting it out over oil, religion or politics.
   Economic recession/depression, peak oil or war, either of these will wreak havoc on an economy based on exports/global trade.

The Windsor Essex region is 70% - 85% reliant on exports of manufactured and agri-business products. What if instead our economy was more balanced between exports and domestic consumption? A more evenly balanced local economy would allow us to absorb the shocks of lower consumption of our products in export markets weakened by any of the scenarios I outlined above.

How can we develop a regional economy? In the event of one of the above problems we will eventually sort ourselves out. To do it proactively the only way to overcome the large corporations that have taken control of our economies is to lobby the Provincial and Federal governments to create trade rules that would enable this to happen. There is a precedent for this type of Federal law, CanCon. CanCon of course forced media outlets to provide Canadian programming and artists the opportunity to be heard and seen. What if retailers had to provide space for a percentage of regional agricultural products and consumer goods? Free trade agreements would prevent us from eliminating products from other jurisdictions but a CanCon law would not stop retailers from selling any product, it would merely offer us the choice to buy something from closer to home and put our money back into our own pockets.

Think of all the consumer goods that we use. In a previous era we had local economies and produced goods much closer to home. The companies were locally owned and the profits came back to benefit our communities. Somewhere along the way we were told globalization was better and more profitable. Somewhere along the way we lost the ability to provide for ourselves and less and less wealth was kept close to home. The effects are all around us. Sprawl, urban decay, apathy and disinterest in local life and culture.

I’d rather not wait for one of these scenarios to play out for things to change. I’d like to see local businesses and our Windsor Essex Development Commission, Windsor Chamber of Commerce and other interested groups and our politicians work together to develop a local economy that can sustain itself in a future fraught with challenges.

Even if none of these problems arise, would it be so bad to have a vibrant and diverse local economy?

Correction

Unfortunately I did not have the proper facts in the post "of Mice and Men" regarding the suppot that the development commission gives to small business

The small business center has fielded 3,497 general inquiries via telephone calls, walk ins and email through the two offices in Windsor and Kingsville. Between these 2 locations, they have also held 612 one-on-one client consultations and conducted 51 seminars, workshops, presentations and networking events with a total attendance of 1,876 people. The economic impact of this office were 53 businesses started and 46 jobs created.

However I still maintain that I stand by my assertion that a simple public statement supporting restarting the Community Improvement Plans and opposing what I call the `Costco Badlands` type of development would do exponentially more to help small business in Windsor than anything stated above.

Another London Article

Since London got their new celebrity Planner, they seem to get a lot more attention paid to planning issues. Here's another article

Their new planner, Sean Galloway, debunked the top ten myths of urban design, and his responses are so good that we wanted to reprint them here just in case the London Free Press decided to take this article off its website. So here goes...

Here then, are Galloway's 10 myths, debunked;

10. It's all about front porches. Indeed, building more houses with front porches is important, but it's really about making friendly buildings and attractive street-scapes.

9. It wants to eliminate the back yard. Back yards are important for privacy, but urban design reminds us not to forget the front yard as a place of activity and usefulness.

8. It's all about density, density, density. It's about providing variety and diversity, allowing people to grow up in a single-family home, move to an apartment, then a townhouse, then back into a single- family home, then back into an apartment as their life progresses -- all in the same neighbourhood.

7. It expects everyone to walk everywhere. It's about providing friendly streets and sidewalks and public transit and other infrastructure to entice people to walk more. Nobody expects the car to be eliminated.

6. It is just about the rear laneway. London is fearful of the rear laneway (for reasons nobody is sure of, considering they are all over Old North and Old South, for example). Some can be unpleasant, but there are examples of attractive back alleys in new urbanist developments across North America. Not everyone wants a big house with a big back yard.

5. It will not fit into a "normal" person's lifestyle. What is normal? People may want to drive to the supermarket for the big shop, but do they want to get in the car and face traffic just to pick up a loaf of bread or litre of milk? People want options. They want variety in the kinds of buildings they interact with, variety that makes the experience of living in a community richer.

4. It is just It's not about replicating Victorian architecture; it's about eliminating repetitive architecture that saps identity from a neighbourhood. about creating pre-war housing architecture.

3. It is all about new urbanism or placemaking. New urbanism a catchphrase, but it's about old-fashioned, grid-style developments with a diversity of home types and architecture. Placemaking involves integrating all industrial, commercial, residential and retail areas.

2. It is just about what the buildings look like. No, it's about how we deliver our walking spaces, our driving spaces, our open spaces. It's more than just architecture and landscaping.

1. It is not economically viable. New urbanist communities are thriving across North America. New ones are being built every day. They're sought after by home buyers.

So Londons new urban planner did some debunking of his own - and we really like his conclusions!