Geography of Hope

The message that we share at SDW is that we can make a difference. Often, it is a message that is lost in the cacophony of fear that mass media spreads. Imagine my surprise when I caught a news story on CTV about a new book by author Chris Turner called The Geography of Hope. Turner wrote the book after the birth of his daughter. The message? The changes that we keep saying should be made, but never quite find the time to do, advocate for or invest in are already happening.

Turner travelled the world to document that successes that individuals, communities, cities and countries have had in building the communities of tomorrow today! Check out the link above to buy his book or this link to his webpage. I think it will give you the hope we are all looking for to continue to fight for the change we want to see.

Debunking the Growth Myth, Part 7

Myth Number 7
If you don't like growth, you're a "NIMBY" or an "Anti".

Reality Check: NIMBYs have valid concerns.

The overused NIMBY acronym, "not in my backyard," is supposed to reflect a selfish attitude, an unwillingness to accept some undesirable development in, or near, the neighbourhood. Similar rhetorical labels include "anti's" (people who are against everything), "gatekeepers", "drawbridge raisers", or "I've got mine." There are far too many examples of how these negative labels have been used against concerned citizens to neutralize opposition to growth.

These labels seem to have the primary purpose of invalidating what may be a very legitimate concern about growth and development. A NIMBY is more likely to be someone who cares enough about the future of his or her community to get out and protect it. You can thank all the great NIMBYs of the past for keeping hazardous wastes dumps, major polluters, and other nuisances out of your community. The more people join together to preserve the quality of their "backyards", the better off the world will be.

People who move to a community and then express concerns about growth are sometimes referred to as “pulling up the drawbridge after them”. Again, this is like to be a distortion of the person’s real motives. Often, newcomers to a community move there because they recognize it has some special qualities. They may also have lived in other towns where they’ve watched similar qualities be destroyed by growth. Thus, they may have a keen awareness of how vulnerable their new community’s assets are. This outside experience can be valuable to a community that has not recently experienced the consequences of rapid growth.

People who want slow growth tend to be those who care very much about the future of their community and want to protect what they value for generations to come. They are usually volunteers who are willing to contribute their time generously in a charitable civic capacity to improve the community and the environment. Is it more accurate for the local newspaper to refer to such a person as anti-growth or as pro-community? Negative labeling distorts and marginalizes legitimate viewpoints. It also tends to polarize issues and discourage productive dialogue. Are you an anti-growther or a dedicated civic volunteer concerned about the future of your community?

read more of the argument against Myth 7 here